While I was waiting to get my hair cut yesterday, I was flipping through the January issue of Good Housekeeping and something--or some
one--caught my eye: Matthew McConaughey. Just a little picture of him on a page entitled "Best Relationship Advice." My interest was piqued. Matt's easy on the eyes, no doubt, but what kind of "wisdom" could this seeming playboy impart to me about relationships? Did he really have anything worthwhile to say? I read on, and here is what he said:
"Sometimes when a woman falls for a guy, she [asks him to change], and he changes so much that she loses her Huck Finn, the rascal in the man she fell in love with. Men are willing to change to make you happy -- but don't completely take the boy out of the man. You're gonna miss him."
I sat back. Hmmm.
I think there is a lot of truth to that statement. And I think it's an especially valid perspective coming from a man--a very cute man who has women dropping at his feet. I thought, "So this is what a man who could have practically any woman really wants." Sure, it's what all men want--freedom! But the essence of McConaughey's statement is not "let us have free reign," but rather "we will do anything for a woman who adores our inner boy." That is powerful knowledge.
Most of the time we women complain and/or roll our eyes when accosted with tales of our husband's most recent boyish antics (me included). Most of the time we want our guy to settle down and be mature. We domesticate them so much that the boy we fell in love with is completely erased. I mean. . . I'm predictable, and part of what attracted me to Mike waaay back in high school was that he was what I
wasn't. At least to me it seemed like he was adventurous, fearless, capricious, spontaneous--in a good way, not a self-destructive way.
Quite frankly,
I wouldn't want to be married to boring
me, so why do I insist that he "be careful," "slow down," and "stay home?" That's
my role. There definitely needs to be a balance in married life, but if my guy needs to let his hair down sometimes (no bald joke intended), why do I need to make him feel guilty about it? Why do women make men "pay" for going and having some fun? Lest I be misunderstood, I am not a proponent of fun that involves hanging out at the local strip joint or gambling in a smokey barroom into the wee hours of the morning whilst shirking familial duties; what I
am promoting is wholesome outdoorsy sports, working out, motocross races, football games, whitewater rafting, rock climbing, dipnet salmon fishing, riding a Harley--whatever floats his boat. Let's face it, a lot of men are adrenaline junkies. And often, whether we want to admit it, that's what makes us twitterpated. (I can't believe I'm actually writing this--my inner feminist is attempting to claw my eyes out this very moment).
So here's my challenge to all my married women friends: This Valentine's Day if you want to give your guy a great gift, let him go out and be Huck Finn. No strings attached. Don't corner him into a nice dinner at a stuffy restaurant, or guilt him into bringing you roses or buying you chocolates or jewelry. Better yet, offer to go
with him on a recreational activity of his choosing (stipulation:
not sex). I've read that spending recreational time with his wife is one of the top five basic male needs (
His Needs, Her Needs by Willard Harley, Jr.). For me it's much easier just to let him go with a friend, but I know that he appreciates it when I give up my agenda to just go play together. It doesn't happen very often, and most of the time I complain the entire time, so I know I have a long way to go in this area. But I'm vowing today to allow the little boy to surface once in a while, without reprimand or restraint.

What think ye, ladies? Are you game?